User talk:HistoricAccount SteveMB

From Erfwiki
Revision as of 12:43, 29 May 2009 by HistoricAccount SteveMB (Talk | contribs) (For Talk/Description Pages)

Jump to: navigation, search

Hi there! It is very nice to see you here! :) -- Muzzafar 04:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Also, on firefox, if you drag and drop the image, you can see the full page. --Raphfrk 22:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

You waited for me to do the Klog, didn't you? Grrr... --Kreistor 15:25, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

No, no, I was just joking. Klogs are a lot of typing. Just suggesting you were dodging it and making me do the work. 8) Seriously, not being serious. --Kreistor 15:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Heheh... gotcha. No worries. I brought the Table over from the Fallout 3 Wiki a couple weeks ago, so know more about it than most. --Kreistor 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
No worries, I got 'em. Uh, Except for the tables. --Commander I. Heartly Noah

You have plans for page Ansom? I saw you change a link to Prince Ansom from Ansom. --Kreistor 01:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Nothing specific; I just habitually use the canonical page name with a pipe to minimize redirects, and tend to include as part of the edit even if I'm revising something unrelated.SteveMB 02:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Okay. I thought maybe you were thinking of a page devoted to a non-Prince Decrypted Ansom under the title-less page name. I'll go back to plain Ansom, then (since if I made the page, I'd call it Decrypted Ansom). --Kreistor 15:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


Now, They have a use and all, but why do we need non-picture descriptions by themselves? Surely just the panel and the written word under it is enough? I can't really click on 'random page' except that 3 out of five are these panels. Good effort... but what are it's uses that a panel by panel description (combining both picture and words) or even a page by page description cannot do?

Oh! and thanks for the work 'Xewleer 07:43, 15 May 2009 (UTC)'

Yes, but why can't we combine the panel-by-panel with the words only stuff? Have you tried using the Random Page thing recently? You'll see what I mean. (Please note that I'm not trying to degrade your work, just trying to figure out why we need so many pages for ONE series of things) Xewleer 23:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


Ichthus created a subpage template. It adds a link back to the panel from the /text and /description pages, but doesn't include it in the actual panel page. It would be worth adding to any new panel by panels that you create. See TBFGK_27:1/Text as an example. --Raphfrk 16:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Not a major issue, I think, but apparently it helps with 'dead-end' page tracking. --Raphfrk 17:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

TBFGK Annotation Wiki Page Cheat Sheat

Linkback for Text/Description Pages


Proposed Reference Style

For Talk/Description Pages

Enter the following footnote pointer into the text where appropriate, using an easily remembered name that will correspond to the name of the linked footnote.


Do not enter footnotes into the Text/Description page itself. These pages are designed as data entry points, not final pages for reading; adding copies of footnotes here is a complication for little benefit.

For Panel Pages

Enter footnotes as follows:

#{{note|name}}Text of footnote.

For Full-Page View Pages

Enter footnotes as follows:

#{{note|name}}Text of footnote.

Piped Links Using Canonical (no redirect needed) Character Names

[[Stanley the Tool|Stanley]] 
[[Wanda Firebaugh|Wanda]] 
[[Parson Gotti|Parson]] 
[[Sizemore Rockwell|Sizemore]] 
[[Prince Ansom|Ansom]] 
[[Vinny Doombats|Vinny]] 
[[Jillian Zamussels|Jillian]] 
[[Sir Webinar|Webinar]] 

RE: Paneler Hacks

Fiddled with the paneler code a bit, should terminate properly now. Let me know if you see anything else of this kind :) Menlo Marseilles 01:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)