User talk:HistoricAccount Balder

From Erfwiki
Revision as of 12:32, 28 April 2009 by Titan (Talk | contribs) (Hippiemancy)

Jump to: navigation, search


In trying to get the reflist template to work (aka, copy in the template code), I'm wondering if it's to do with this change to Common.css not having been done? Or am I missing something terribly simple? --OniExpress 04:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Using new-style references via <ref>, <references> and {{reflist}} requires Cite.php to be installed. Without it, your best bet is to convert the page to use the older Ref/Note system. Cheers! —RevenantTalk 12:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
So far we have been using a simple workaround: <sup>[]</sup> displays [1]. It might not look as good as Wikipedia references, but at least it is easy to do plus it does the numbering automatically. If somebody comes with a better idea it would be nice. Just keep it simple, please! :) -- Muzzafar 15:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


A question I wanted to pose. I was thinking that images in some of the wikis here would be nice; not so much that they are strictly necessary (it's horribly unlikely that someone would see a wiki here before the relevant entry in the comic itself), but it strikes me that they would be beneficial in a few places. But obviously it's not my or any of our art, and regardless that you maintain/gain the rights of anything entered here, I figured this was a question better asked before rather than after. Oh, and I honestly haven't even checked to see if file uploads are an activated feature here yet, but who fusses over the little details like that? :P --OniExpress 01:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah Images are awesome and anything is fair game. I'm even going so far as to say I'm not going to question the use of copyrighted images we don't own until the owner objects to their use here, for now. That policy is subject to change. --Balder 06:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

It looks like someone's going to have to enable uploading before we can add any image files. Henry 07:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Image files now enabled and tested. Working! --Balder 13:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! =) Henry 01:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for that as well. :) They arn't necessary, and I didn't want to step on any toes with the matter. The Titans wiki made me think of it the most initially. I'll get some work done editing images down to proper proportions tomorrow afternoon. --OniExpress 00:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Canon, proposed canon and speculation

Hi Rob! Several questions here:

  • You created a page for Croaking. Can we automatically consider the text that you wrote a Canon since it is the "Word of God"?
  • You have written quite a lot of information on the GitP forums. I see it as pretty valuable for readers since it is the "Word of God", basically. I do not know about Rich's plans about the Erfworld forum on the GitP forums, but I assume there is a chance it might not last. Can we save your messages in some form in this Wiki, for example as Word of God article with references to the GitP forum posts? I guess it would make it possible to refer to it as to.. well, the Word of God. What do you think?
  • There is some information on this Wiki that is taken right from the comic (for example, magic disciplines in Magic). Would that be Speculation or Proposed Canon? Can unambiguous information with references to comic strips (like Caesar Borgata is Chief Warlord to Transylvito[2]) be considered Proposed Canon?

Thank you! -- Muzzafar 14:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

UPD: Sorry, I have not read the rules well enough. I think Speculation and Proposed Canon are explained quite explicitly there. -- Muzzafar 18:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
UPD: I made the page. Hope you don't mind. -- Muzzafar 21:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey Rob, I'm not sure about what type(s) the Parson's plans article and related articles should be. They're unlikely to directly become canon, or proposed canon, but are mostly different from pure speculation, as the links can be fairly obvious but not completely spelled out by the comic/word of God. Thanks, Doran 00:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Luckmancy vs Luckamancy

Hi Rob!
On one occasion this discipline of Magic is call Luckmancy (and apparently Luckmancers). On others it is LuckAmancy and Luckamancers. What is the right name? -- Muzzafar 08:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Luckamancy is right. Much like "Vinny" is right and I know at least one "Vinnie" got through lettering. We'll need some help rounding up all bloopers.

Plot Summary from Wikipedia

Hi Rob!
I think I managed to copy the current article + 2 earlier versions of the plot summary from the Wikipedia. I copied the text to this article. In the next few days I (and whoever willing to help) will try to merge the three versions. I suppose we can then copy the plot summary to a separate page.
Please let know if we can provide any further assistance. -- Muzzafar 09:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Awesome Muzzafar, thanks for all your hard work! Balder 05:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
It's my pleasure! I really appreciate your appreciation. :D
I did my best to combine the three revisions of the plot summary and copied it over here.
I guess we could also use your knol to further improve the plot summary, couldn't we? Please advise. -- Muzzafar 15:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Sure, though SteveMB wrote most of the knol. I should be doing more with that as well. We'll make it a priority after we launch and get the bugs out. But yes, I would like to see a very detailed plot summary, and eventually a wiki article annotating every page. There's enough to keep many people busy here for a long time! Balder 16:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


Is the Fate Axis of Hippiemancy supposed to be 'Singamancy' or 'Signamancy'? It is shown as 'Signamancy' in the magic axis Klog[3]. -- Ichthus 17:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Signamancy. Like the Peace sign, man. Like the protest sign, man. Signs, signs, everywhere a sign. Far out. Balder 17:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)